Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleonore Lilja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Universe Sweden. MBisanz ^talk 00:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonore Lilja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a person who fails notability guidelines. Only one news article about her participation in Miss International: http://laodong.com.vn/van-hoa/lo-thi-huong-tram-co-tao-nen-bat-ngo-ky-dieu-tai-miss-international-165698.bld and articles about her being disqualified from Top Model Sverige: https://www.google.co.uk/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=6yjiVtaNHavS8AfW2IH4Aw#tbm=nws&q=%22eleonore+lilja%22 Linguist 111^talk 02:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough independent sources to write a biography. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 12:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article size is not a reason for deletion. Notability is based on quite the opposite actually. BabbaQ (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 18:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability, none of this seems to suggest better improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is not based on article size or quality. It is based on the notability guidelines. which she passes.BabbaQ (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - she has won a national beauty title and participated in a international Big4 pageant. She has also participated in Top Model show in Sweden. per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The two users !voting delete are wrong based on WP:GNGs own critera: Conversely, if the source material exists, even very poor writing and referencing within a Wikipedia article will not decrease the subject's notability. Article quality of size is not a reason for deletion. BabbaQ (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The article also covers all aspects of the General notability guideline section. BabbaQ (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being a competitor in the Miss International contest is not enough to be notable, and being kicked off a reality television show even less so.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being a national winner for a international Big4 pageant is. Being a competitor of a reality model series as a model is notable. Even more so when she had a controversial exit. Plenty of good sources. She is covered by WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 17:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: Another option could be to redirect to Miss Universe Sweden (and preserve the article's history under the redirect), which may be preferable to deletion. Linguist 111^talk 17:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.